Tag Archive: micro plastics



Photo by Anna Shvets on Pexels.com

In common with many other environmental issues, when considering the use of a material, a ’cradle to grave‘ approach must be adopted in weighing up the environmental disadvantages against the advantages to mankind. Plastics, in many forms, are currently in demand. Whereas for certain purposes, plastics have merits and lessen the consumption of other materials, but these in all forms are not biodegradable

Currently we all live in the rise of the plastic age. Disposable type is on top of consumption list of plastic.  Which means it’s almost difficult to live even a day without using some sort of disposable plastic whether it’s the plastic bottle/ cup having any drink in it, the disposable tray or container we used at lunch, or the plastic bag in our refrigerators that store our edible items. People are using and tossing off plastic at overwhelming rates.

Photo by Leonid Danilov on Pexels.com

Just over a century ago plastics were made from fossil fuels. Production and development of thousands of new plastic products accelerated at rocket speed, so converting the recent age that life without plastics would be bizarre today. In the recent past it was assumed that plastics revolutionized human life by introduction of safety gadgets like helmets, incubators and equipment for cleaning water and making vehicles light weighted, made space travelling easy by saving fuel consumption. As time went on, heavy iron, brass and wood items were replaced by light plastic. Our kitchens are full of plastic containers that have been replaced by old glassware. Restaurants and tea stalls also have replaced their natural earthenware with modern cheap plastic utensils. Water supply pipes, buckets and mugs were seen paving the way in the bathrooms. Even our daily wearable items like face masks, clothes safety kits, and luxury decorative items on our clothes have made up of plastic. Pen, pencils and other stationery items also have plastic material as an essential item as a part of their manufacturing.  Lives had seemed very convenient because of plastic.

These plastic amenities offer, however, led to a throw-away culture and disturbed natural ecosystem that reveals the material’s dark side: Since the 1950s, around 8.3 billion tons of plastic have been produced worldwide and within just the past 50 years, plastic production has become doubled globally. Today, almost 40 percent of the disposable plastic produced per year, about 2 million plastic bags, a million plastic bottles and up to five trillion plastic wrappers are bought around the world every minute. Many of these products, such as plastic bags and food wrappers, have a lifespan of less than a minute to hours, yet their remnants may persist in our environment for many hundred years in micro plastic forms.

Photo by Magda Ehlers on Pexels.com

In the coming decades, it is expected that globalization of commodities and their increasing consumption rates will lead to depletion of natural resources. In this regard, crude oil is universally recognized to be a major unsustainable resource: its rapid utilization has caused an increase of the global atmospheric temperature by increments of concentrations of a number of greenhouse gasses, to levels that have largely exceeded the normal ones. Global warming and other environmental issues like haze, smog and relevant health issues are already under discussions. The majority of plastics currently used are contrived from crude oil and related fossil fuels, such as coal and natural. Furthermore, their decaying time prediction and, hence, their persistence in the environment go well beyond the expectations. In this way in this polluted world plastic became the bone of contention due to rapid consumption and persistence and appearing as the main villain.

Have we ever thought what happens to that plastic once they became trash? It doesn’t simply disappear into the thin air. Plastics don’t decompose like organic substances. Instead, they break down further into smaller and smaller parts, considerably of which ends up in oceans, where it is spent by marine wild life and eventually to humans through food webs. In this way it exists in our surrounding environment in some way or other and keeps on increasing the challenge to all ecosystems of our planet. Scientific research proof that wasted plastic if buried underground in landfills, it might stay buried until future generations rediscover it, but it’s leachate keeps leaking around its surrounding soil and changes the natural composition of soil; fertile soil becoming unfertile soil and barren. Same problematic story appears for plastic that reaches the ocean, some is wash away up on coastlines or consumed by wildlife. Furthermost remains in the sea where it breaks down into minor fragments.

When it ends up in landfills or incinerators, both PVC and PVDC can release highly toxic chemicals called dioxin, and bisphenol which are hormonal disturbers, says the World Health Organization. The major contributions to environmental  degradation from  plastic are  generation  of hazardous  air  pollutants  (HAPS) and  generation of hazardous waste (HW)  and  solid  waste. This abolishes the ozone layer and actually produces or speeds up Global Warming. Eventually, the earth’s temperature is rising. The rise of the earth fever has caused ice caps to melt and many natural habitats to be devastated.

Photo by Tom Fisk on Pexels.com

 All types of plastic based solid waste further become a part of the environment either by mixing of waste water with freshwater or pure soil and with outside healthy air, so the process of uncontrolled contamination mixing begins, it must be checked. Till date, we are usually aware of 7 types of pollution which are; soil, air, water, noise, thermal, radioactive and light. But there comes the 8th type of pollution, which is plastic pollution. Gradually because of its drastic negative impacts this plastic pollution now became at tops the list of pollution types. It is impeding the ocean and wildlife health the maximum even plant lives are not out of risk. It is estimated that almost 80% of marine debris originates as land-based trash and the remaining 20% is allocated to at-sea. It is evaluated that around 90% of the plastics in the pelagic marine environment are micro plastics (less than 5 mm in diameter) created by nonstop process of weathering.

A glimpse at the world’s oceans can easily point out the dimensions of this plastic problem. A 2017 study by an environmental Foundation found that by 2050, earth’s oceans will contain more plastic than fish. Already, there are huge, submerged, moving concentrations of trash waste in the planet’s oceans, known as garbage patches. Great pacific sea between Japan and California, has a garbage patch, for example, is twice the size of Texas, the majority of that patch has plastic waste. This Great Pacific Garbage Patch, continually growing, it performs like a tornado, dragging ever more rubbish into its center.

 Every other day we are getting the news that a large bird’s community had died having many small plastic in their guts or a pregnant whale was found dead with 50 pounds of plastic in the stomach. These figures are alarming and threatening. A material said to be environmentally friendly when it has the quality of being non-destructive for the surrounding environment. It is important to appreciate that this interaction works in reciprocating order, such as the effect of the material on the biologic environment and the effects of the biologic environment on the material. Any type of material from its working environment further enters into the surrounding atmosphere via either solid waste, sewerage waste, obnoxious gases or volatile compounds, thus polluting all land, water, and air systems.

Photo by Yogendra Singh on Pexels.com

Plastic marine debris is of particular concern due to its longevity in the marine environment, the chemical and physical risks it presents to marine and wildlife, and the fact that it is frequently mistaken as a food by aquatic organisms, and further its long-term contribution to the food chain and food web. The impact of plastic pollution through ingestion and entanglement of marine fauna, ranging from zooplankton to cetaceans, barnacles, mussels, fish, sea-fowls, marine reptiles, and their predators are well reported.

There are quite much to learn about ill health effects due to micro plastics, there exposure in animals has been linked to cell damage, liver abnormality, inflammation, cancer, neurological disorders, starvation, infertility and fetal disorders. Usually there are almost 50,000 plastic particles that each of us breathes and eats every year and the micro plastic pollution falling on some cities undoubtedly have an impact, particularly as many of the chemicals in plastics are known to foundation a variety of health complications. These micro particles can easily be penetrated to skin, nasal cavity, and via the respiratory system into other body organs and can be reasoned for by many diseases.

Plastic based Polymer releases a number of monomers in its working areas. These aerosols are air-suspended liquid or solid molecules that contain a variety of micro plastic of many polymer composite materials along with other microbial organisms. This suspended particulate matter of aerosols produced during different procedures and consumption processes further reduce the indoor air quality (IAQ).

Photo by Lisa Fotios on Pexels.com

Major sections of the society are progressively awaking and accepting the damaging properties of plastic, so they are taking practical steps to reduce plastic ill impacts. The use of certain disposal plastic items especially plastic bags are being banned in many countries some, in fact, banned the production of plastic and its goods. At least some people apprehend these pollution facts and start using jute and cotton bags which are generally environmental and reusable. Due to cancer-causing effects of plastic many users alter back to glass containers and jars for storing their food items. Besides plastic recycling has been extensively efficacious in reducing this plastic pollution and halts further manufacturing of plastic from scratch again which helps to a great extent. Research is also under process to reuse plastic such as generating electricity and also finding a better environmental substitute for it in the forthcoming future. Actually, at global level many countries took pioneer step and passed international laws related to excessive use of plastic and they are constantly working to reduce its harmful effect on earth.

Photo by Buu011fra Dou011fan on Pexels.com


white ceramic teacup with saucer near two books above gray floral textile

Photo by Thought Catalog on Pexels.com

We’re gradually conscious of how plastic is polluting our atmosphere, and be the reason of a number of health and climatic hazards. Significant scientific attention has been now focused on how these notorious microplastics – tiny pieces ranging from 5 millimetres down to 100 nanometres in diameter – are migrated to seas and functioning their way into the aquatic creatures, to further food chain and food webs. Plants also badly affected due to disturbance in their nutrient absorption. Microfibers another source of plastic emerges from textiles like nylon and polyester. They often wash off clothes and enter the ecosystem through washing machine wastewater.

Humans consume microplastics via many channels. We might ingest them while eating seafood, breathe them in through the air, or consume food with trace amounts of its plastic packaging. Now, a new study in the journal Environmental Science and Technology says it’s possible that humans may be consuming anywhere from 39,000 to 52,000 micro plastic particles a year. With added approximations of how much micro plastic might be inhaled, that number is more than 74,000. A new alarming news is that we are drinking microplastics and microfilaments via our routine wise tea beverages on daily bases.

drink tea green natural

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Researchers at the American Chemical Society have found that plastic teabags can transfer billions of micro plastic particles into a beverage when it is brewed. Despite growing concern over micro plastic contamination, experts are still not clear how the particles may impact human health.

Plastic breaks down into tiny micro plastics over time, and then into even smaller nano plastics, which are less than 100 nanometers in size. In contrast, a human hair has a diameter of about 75,000 nanometers, which means that nano plastics are not even be noticeable to the human eye.

Some tea companies have recently made the switch from traditional paper teabags to plastic ones, and a team led by Nathalie Tufenkji set out to conclude whether these teabags may be discharging micro- and nano plastics into the beverage during brewing. The researchers also coveted to examine the effects of microscopic plastic particles on small aquatic organisms called Daphnia magna, or water fleas, which are generally used in environmental health research.

The study was focused on four different commercial teas packaged in plastic teabags, which were cut open to remove the tea leaves and washed. Next, the teabags were heated in flasks of water to simulate brewing situations.

 

flat lay photography of tea in white teacup with saucer

Photo by rawpixel.com on Pexels.com

Using electron microscopy, the team found that when a single plastic teabag reached brewing temperature, it released about 11.6 billion micro plastic and 3.1 billion nano plastic particles into the water. These levels are thousands of times higher than what has been previously reported in other foods.

 

At next experimental level, Daphnia magna, water fleas were treated with various doses of the micro- and nano plastics confined in the various teabags. While they did survive, the Daphnia magna, water fleas showed anomalous development and performance. According to the experts, further research is necessary to conclude if plastic particles could have more restrained or chronic effects on humans and other living beings.

 


pexels-photo-1904733.jpeg

Photo by David Fagundes on Pexels.com

Scientists have known for years that plastic pollution can exacerbate climatic and health hazards, but our understanding of their connection has evolved significantly in recent years. Plastic are persistently present in our daily consumable items for examples contact lenses. Contact lenses are regularly prepared from a mixture of acrylic glass, silicones and fluoropolymers that permits companies to create a softer plastic material which permits oxygen to pass through to the eye.

Every year, worldwide a number of consumers were using contact lenses for their vision needs and for their fashion demands. After specific time period their consumption date expired and they disposed of in simple garbage bin or flush out in washrooms. Recent research conducted in American university proved that Americans flush 2.6 to 2.9 billion contact lenses down the drain. By accumulation this litter and studying how it persists in this environment, the study provides the first estimate of the potential burden of micro plastics. There’s been a lot of research done on single-use, lower-value plastics such as straws, plastic bags, however no one has yet looked at how these everyday medical devices may contribute to pollution in our soil and waterways,”.

An estimated 45 million people in the U.S. wear contact lenses. Two-thirds of contact lens wearers are female .The average age of contact lens wearers worldwide is 31 years old.
An estimated 8% of contact lens wearers are under 18 years old, 17% are between ages 18-24, and 75% of adults age 25 and older wear contacts.

To apprehend how lenses break down in sewage, Rolsky and his colleagues placed the corrective lenses in wastewater treatment tanks filled with hungry microorganisms. The team left the lenses in this potion for 14, 96 or 172 hours—the typical range of time waste may spend in such facilities—but they discovered the lenses had only started to degrade a little after 172 hours in this environment.

Researchers in the study suggests that in the US at least, around 14 billion lenses (15-20% ) are thrown away, amounting to around 200,000kg (441,000lb) of plastic waste every year. other underdeveloped countries lack such consumption data.

Much of the waste water material ends up as a digested sludge which is then often spread on farmland. The Rolsky and his colleagues estimated that about 13,000kg of contact lens plastic ends up dumped in this manner.

“Contact lenses persist during water treatment, they become part of sewage sludge,” Prof Rolf Halden, from the Centre for Environmental Health Engineering at Arizona State told BBC News. “We know that whatever’s in sludge can make its way into runoff from heavy rains, back into surface water and that is an outlet to the oceans; there is the potential of these lenses being taken on quite a journey.”

The researchers are concerned that this poses an ecological risk in food web and food cycles and may allow the accumulation of persistent toxic pollutants in vulnerable organisms such as worms and birds. “If earthworms munch the soil and birds nourish on it, then that slugged plastic make the same journey as is done by plastics debris in oceans, they are incorporated by biota that are also part of the human food chain,” said Prof Halden.

To work out the impact of waste water plants on these materials, the researchers exposed five polymers in contact lenses to anaerobic and aerobic micro-organisms commonly found in these treatment facilities. Lenses are not generally reprocessed, although one of the largest manufacturers Bausch + Lomb introduced a programme last year.

The authors of the study say that lenses should be recycled where this is possible, but if not they should be disposed of by putting them in with other solid, non-recyclable waste. “The simple solution to this issue is for people not to put the lenses down the sink or shower or toilet!” said Prof Halden.

“They are a real improvement in quality of life and are a justified use of plastic, so if we decide as a society that we want to use plastic for these purposes, we should also present the consumer with the chance to get rid of these materials in a responsible fashion.”